You need AVATAR or IPHONE?

One is the nominal, one is false?

Think of this issue, an article from this:
IPhone "magic" absolutely terrifying

IPHONE the author's viewpoint is in a new divide, which I think China's Internet users, everyone has been talking about younger age naive urban youth Jianhaozhuan. QQ is the case, 51 as well. So why someone would spend a few一个AVATAR and have money to spend 5 K has一个IPHONE, which is the difference between the what? A very virtual, a very real. They are similar in that the symbols used to show off. I would like to make clear that we attract the poor and the rich user distinction.

Because the poor have no money, nothing can not afford to buy, so a lot of it around a meager amount. The poor have not the opportunity to earn money, so a lot of leisure time to kill boring day. Wealthy people can choose things too much, the budget is always enough and aides did not make money leisure, impulsive consumption will be carried out, the rich very busy, to earn money, no leisure time to consumer boredom economy. This is the Internet field practitioners of a common sense is also a reality.

Therefore, AVATAR sold to the poor, IPHONE sold to the rich.

IPHONE you can be a real world out flaunt things. AVATAR is a virtual world you can show off things. The symbol of things, you can use 200 MP3, as the above article said, a poor students from perhaps the most consume only low-end MP3 or cell phone, although they from the functions and IPHONE far from the difference between the price the difference so great. Of course, you can never QQ on consumer AVATAR do not have to, we can free chat. In symbolic level, or both IPHONE AVATAR is the same, they are all imaginary things. Poor or rich, or, human nature is the same.

Virtual world people's sense of happiness VS real-world person's sense of happiness any different? AVATAR is owned and IPHONE different. I have always suspected that different in the authenticity. Therefore, I do not believe IPHONE would create a new divide, it is only a symbol, not to the rich with those totally unnecessary function, the rich kids will go to school with the IPHONE learn English better than the poor? No, the rich high level of education is because other things, such as do you have money to a better school, not IPHONE function. The gap between rich and poor has never been lost because of the Internet, because the Internet has never been creating new divide.

AVATAR increased by a poor sense of happiness? Or to ask this question? Tencent have to the poor so that they provide the function of the happiness? If yes, money-making the very reason, if not, money-making of some of the problems. I think AVATAR a mansion to a poor day in the same experience, Tencent have earned this money. Have a ZONE, SPACE and possession of a big city residential, is owned and IPHONE AVATAR the distinction, so I understand why the richest man in the end those who are real estate developers, and not playing those guys SPACE. Some people trafficking experience to the poor, it was addressed to the rich.

Hope, and candy, the real "hope, and candy," VS virtual "hope, and the candy" really is the difference between the poor and rich signs now more一个IPHONE. The number of Internet companies to let this fury can create new virtual consumption ah. Entities consumer goods always been the rich more, and the virtual world of hope and candy, not many people even increased by 404 swap a lot. 404 swap rich things difficult, 404 swap poor hallucinations very easily.

In fact, the petty bourgeoisie consumption IPHONE more fundamental is the poor, it will only use symbols to express themselves non-existent decent, and then seek to move closer to the rich. I finally came to understand the direction of the development of the IT industry, the experience economy, the sale is that you give them experience skills.